🦠 Necrocene
A cross-domain analysis of Political, Economic, Cultural, and Ecological theories.
The Validation Metrics: Quantifying the system's "success" on its own terms.
Establishing a triage containing observations of social experience.
Why do we measure success through metrics like Engagement and Material Benefits, and what does this focus cause us to overlook or sacrifice in terms of well-being, meaning, and authentic Belief?
1. Are metrics gamed to show false success?
2. Do measurements reflect well-being or mere activity?
3. Is assimilation forced rather than voluntary?
- GDP vs. genuine progress indicator
- Social mobility statistics
- Cultural assimilation rates
"Our precision strikes have an unprecedented terrorist-to-civilian ratio."
The Mirror
Capacity for Self-Awarenes
To validate the operation using metrics that obscure the humanitarian catastrophe.
Counting "terrorists killed" while ignoring civilian deaths; measuring "restraint" by bombs not dropped.
Quantitative Rigor: Hiding ethical bankruptcy behind body counts and military metrics.
Vanity Metrics: Outcomes like engagement, material benefits, assimilation, and belief are tracked to validate system performance while masking dysfunction.
Social Media Engagement Metrics (2004-present)
The development of likes, shares, comments, and engagement rates as primary measurements demonstrates how platforms reduce human interaction to quantified engagement, driving behavioral modification and belief formation through algorithmic feedback loops.
Sources: Oxford Internet Institute | Center for Humane Technology | Data & Society Research Institute
"The Tyranny of Metrics" by Jerry Muller (2018)
Muller's critique of how quantification and measurement systems distort human behavior and social institutions, forcing complex realities into simplified metrics that serve power rather than truth.

