How we produce, exchange, and steward resources. This is the domain of reciprocal exchange, circular systems, and transparent accounting. Here, we master roles like mutual aid weaver, cradle-to-cradle designer, and commons fund steward to create an economy of care and abundance.
Implement “Consent-Based Resource Mandates” where all major allocations of human time and physical assets (land, tools, energy) require explicit, time-bound community consent—and can be revoked if misused or misaligned.
Allocate critical resources through opaque, top-down channels that favor the powerful, with no clear process for community input or revocation of misused mandates.
• 100% of resource mandates publicly logged with clear scope and timeline • High usage of revocation pathways without fear of reprisal • Equitable distribution of labor and physical assets
Yes — Resource allocation is a transparent, revocable trust. Power over “who gets what” is circulated through consent, not hoarded by authority.
Maintain a “Living Design Accountability Ledger” that tracks the full lifecycle impact of every community innovation—from source materials to end-of-life—and holds designers accountable through public review and iterative improvement.
Promote “innovation” that externalizes social and ecological costs, hides supply chains, and designs for planned obsolescence, with no accountability for long-term harm.
• 100% of community innovations include public lifecycle assessments • High rates of repairability and circular design • Reduction in toxic or non-recyclable materials
Yes — Innovation is transparent and accountable. Power to “design the future” is shared, not hoarded by unaccountable technocrats.
Form “Inclusive Craft Guilds” that center traditional knowledge, intergenerational skill-sharing, and accessible apprenticeships—ensuring art and craft are communal practices, not luxury commodities.
Exclude marginalized artisans from markets through gatekeeping, credentialism, and commodification, treating craft as a status symbol rather than a living cultural practice.
• High participation across ages, genders, and backgrounds • Revitalization of endangered craft traditions • Craft integrated into community rituals and daily life
Yes — Art and craft are co-created and shared. Power to “make beauty” is a community right, not a market privilege.
Establish “Open-Access Fabrication Commons”—community workshops with shared tools, open-source designs, and skill-sharing—where anyone can learn to make, repair, and innovate.
Concentrate manufacturing in proprietary, closed factories that exclude community input, hide working conditions, and design for obsolescence rather than repair.
• 90%+ community access to fabrication tools and training • High rates of repair and local production • Low waste from disposable goods
Yes — Making is a shared, accessible capacity. Power to produce is distributed, not locked behind corporate IP and capital barriers.
Create “Sovereign Harvesting Agreements” where all resource extraction requires explicit, time-bound consent from both human and ecological stakeholders (e.g., via Council of All Beings), with real-time monitoring and immediate revocation for harm.
Grant permanent extraction rights to corporations through opaque deals, treating nature as a “resource inventory” to be depleted, with no meaningful community or ecological consent.
• 100% of extraction governed by public, revocable agreements • Regenerative harvest rates verified by ecological data • High community trust in resource governance
Yes — Harvesting is a sacred trust with clear boundaries and community control. Power over “resources” is shared with the more-than-human world.
Co-create a “Participatory Prosperity Charter” that defines prosperity as community-wide resilience and well-being—not GDP—and uses consensus to guide all production decisions.
Impose top-down economic plans that prioritize investor returns and GDP growth, silencing community input on what “prosperity” even means.
• 80%+ community participation in charter creation/review• Prosperity metrics aligned with well-being, not extraction• High trust in economic decision-making
Yes — Prosperity is a shared, evolving definition. Power to decide “what is enough” is circulated, not hoarded by elites.

Community Resilience Steward: Cultivates robust, diverse, and adaptive local economies focused on well-being and stability, enabling the community to recover from and adapt to disruptions.
Circular Fabricator: Operates small-scale, ethical workshops for producing durable goods, prioritizing repair, reuse, and recycling in a closed-loop system.
Ecological Harvest Guardian: Manages the sustainable and respectful drawing of resources from nature, ensuring regenerative practices and preventing depletion.
Community Artisan: Creates objects of beauty and daily use that embed cultural meaning, strengthen local identity, and are made to last for generations.
Open-Source Solutions Designer: Develops appropriate, robust, and liberating technologies; all designs are shared as a common resource for all to use and adapt.
Capacity & Commons Coordinator: Matches community members' skills and passions with projects, while maintaining shared tools, spaces, and resource libraries.
Minerals and Metals, Petroleum and Biofuels, etc.).Design and Innovation).Extraction and Harvesting).This Commons is the antidote to the opaque, extractive supply chains of capitalism. It makes the entire material footprint of the community visible and manageable. It is essential for the Ecological Harvest Guardian to set sustainable yields, the Circular Fabricator to source materials, and the Open-Source Solutions Designer to share innovations. It turns production from a private, profit-driven activity into a public, ecologically-regulated process.
A dynamic, open-source platform that serves as the collective brain and memory for the community's material metabolism. It maps the entire lifecycle of resources, from source to reuse.
"The Regenerative Resource Commons"
"The Metabolic Workshop Complex"
To oversee and facilitate the healthy, circular, and equitable flow of materials and energy through the community, ensuring that all production and resourcing activities enhance, rather than deplete, ecological and social capital.
Material Metabolism Pod Digital Headquarters
To govern the high-stakes decision of whether to introduce a new material, technology, or production process into the community. This is the primary gatekeeping mechanism against "enshittification" and ecological harm, preventing well-intentioned but damaging innovations from destabilizing the system.
Open-Source Solutions Designer and Community Resilience Steward present the proposal and the review feedback in a public assembly, facilitating a discussion focused on long-term impacts (Planning and Vision).Ecological Harvest Guardian and Circular Fabricator establish clear metrics for success and environmental monitoring.Capacity & Commons Coordinator integrates the lessons learned into the community's knowledge base."New Resource & Production Proposal" Protocol Suite
Production Optimization Toolkit
An annual, quantitative and qualitative audit that measures the community's success in moving from a linear, extractive economy to a circular, regenerative one.
Annual "State of Our Metabolism" Report System
Implement a “Consent-Based Debt & Liability Framework” where all financial obligations are created through explicit, revocable community consent, with clear pathways for renegotiation and relief—transforming debt from a tool of control into a covenant of care.
Enforce debt as a permanent, inescapable burden that criminalizes poverty, extracts wealth from the vulnerable, and creates lifelong cycles of obligation to the powerful.
• 100% of debt agreements include clear, revocable consent clauses• High usage of debt renegotiation pathways• Drastic reduction in debt-related trauma and incarceration
Yes — Liability is a shared, compassionate responsibility. Power to “owe” is held with dignity, not weaponized as control.
Create an “Accountable Aid & Remittances System” where all incoming resources (e.g., from diaspora, grants) are governed by community-defined priorities and tracked through a public ledger, ensuring aid flows to collective needs, not individual accumulation.
Channel aid and remittances through opaque, top-down systems that create dependency, reward compliance, and allow elites to capture resources while the vulnerable remain in need.
• 100% of aid/remittances publicly tracked and aligned with community priorities• High satisfaction with aid outcomes• Reduction in aid-induced dependency or inequality
Yes — Aid is a trust, not a gift. Power to “receive support” is structured to circulate benefits, not hoard them.
Maintain a real-time, public “Transparent Finance & Tax Ledger” that shows exactly how all community funds are raised (e.g., levies, contributions) and spent, with clear, accessible justifications for every allocation.
Obscure public finance behind complex budgets, hidden subsidies, and tax loopholes that benefit the powerful while burdening the marginalized, creating an illusion of transparency without substance.
• 100% of community financial flows publicly logged
• High community trust in financial governance
• Reduction in perceived corruption or favoritism
Yes — Finance is a transparent, accountable commons. Power to “spend money” is shared, not hoarded by unaccountable authorities.
Co-create a “Participatory Reciprocity Charter” that defines the community’s shared values for mutual aid and exchange—not as charity, but as a sacred web of interdependence—and uses consensus to guide all economic decisions.
Impose top-down “reciprocity” programs that frame mutual aid as a handout from the powerful, silencing community input on what “mutuality” even means.
• 80%+ community participation in charter creation/review• High trust scores in “Reciprocity & Mutuality Index”• Reduction in transactional, extractive exchanges
Yes — Reciprocity is a shared, evolving covenant. Power to define “mutual aid” is circulated, not hoarded by institutions.
Design an “Inclusive Trade & Tourism Protocol” that ensures all external exchange (e.g., with other communities) is structured to benefit local artisans, farmers, and hosts—centering their agency, pricing, and cultural integrity.
Exploit trade and tourism to extract value from local communities, imposing external prices, commodifying culture, and displacing residents for the benefit of outside investors.
• High satisfaction among local producers and hosts• Fair, transparent pricing structures• Tourism that enhances, not erodes, cultural and ecological integrity
Yes — Exchange with the outside world is dignified and reciprocal. Power to “set terms” is held by the community, not external markets.
Establish an “Open Goods & Services Exchange”—a public, digital platform where community members can list needs and offerings, with transparent tracking of flows and no corporate intermediaries taking a cut.
Concentrate control of goods and services in corporate marketplaces that extract value, obscure true costs, and commodify every human need.
• 90%+ community access to the exchange platform• High volume of non-monetized exchanges• Low participation in extractive platforms
Yes — Exchange is a direct, transparent relationship. Power to “meet needs” is distributed, not mediated by profit-driven platforms.

Mutual Aid Network Weaver: Facilitates systems of non-monetized exchange and mutual support, strengthening the social fabric through generalized reciprocity.
Local Exchange Facilitator: Manages the logistics of distributing goods and coordinating services within and between bioregional communities.
Commons Fund Steward: Administers collectively managed resources for public projects, social care, and universal basic services, replacing coercive taxation.
Cultural Ambassador: Facilitates meaningful and equitable cultural and material exchange with other communities, ensuring visits are respectful and mutually beneficial.
Solidarity Coordinator: Manages the direct and unconditional sharing of surplus resources with other communities in times of need or imbalance.
Restorative Accountability Facilitator: Guides processes for addressing broken agreements or harms, focusing on repairing relationships rather than punitive debt.
‍
Trade and Tourism and local Goods and Services transfer.Aid and Remittances and the Commons Fund.Debt and Liability agreements, ensuring they are structured fairly and transparently.This Commons makes the invisible economy of care, reciprocity, and resource flow visible. It is the primary tool for the Mutual Aid Network Weaver to connect people, the Local Exchange Facilitator to optimize logistics, and the Solidarity Coordinator to mobilize aid. It prevents the hoarding of information and resources, ensuring the economy remains a living, responsive system.
"The Livelyhood Flow Commons"
"The Flow Weavers Lodge"
To ensure the smooth, equitable, and resilient flow of all forms of value (material and immaterial) through the community, fostering deep reciprocity and preventing bottlenecks or exploitation.
Flow Weavers Pod Digital Headquarters
To manage the high-stakes, recurring situation where a highly desired or essential resource (e.g., a specialized tool, a limited harvest, housing in a prime location) cannot meet immediate demand. This is where "fairness" is most tested and where conflict over access can arise, threatening the principle of Reciprocity and Mutuality.
Local Exchange Facilitator, with all relevant details and a defined period for expressing need.Mutual Aid Network Weaver and Commons Fund Steward facilitate a process where claimants describe their intended use and need, moving beyond a simple queue to a more nuanced understanding of community benefit and urgency.Restorative Accountability Facilitator, with usage scheduled and tracked in the Commons."Scarce Resource Allocation" Protocol Suite
Exchange Optimization Toolkit
A beautiful and insightful assessment that reframes the community's economy not in terms of GDP, but in terms of the circulation of care, resources, and mutual support.
Annual "Flow of Gifts" Report System
Implement a “Consent-Based Tax and Levies Framework” where all community funding is raised through transparent, time-bound levies that require explicit, revocable consent from those funding them, with clear pathways for renegotiation or revocation.
Impose taxes and fees through opaque, top-down channels that favor the powerful through loopholes, while burdening the marginalized with regressive levies, with no clear process for community input or revocation.
• 100% of levies publicly logged with clear scope and timeline • High usage of revocation pathways without fear of reprisal • Equitable distribution of funding burdens
Yes — Taxation is a sacred covenant of consent. Power to “collect funds” is circulated through transparency and revocability, not hoarded by unaccountable authorities.
Implement a “Living Wage and Care Accountability” system where all labor is valued not just by market rates, but by its contribution to community care and resilience, with regular public audits and community-led standards for fair work.
Enforce labor markets that treat human time as a commodity to be minimized, with accountability focused on productivity metrics for shareholders, not dignity or care for workers.
• 100% of community labor meets living wage and care standards • High worker satisfaction and dignity scores • Reduction in burnout and alienation
Yes — Labor is honored as care. Power to “set wages” is a community act of valuation, not a corporate cost-cutting exercise.
Maintain an “Open-Goods Accountability Ledger” that tracks the full lifecycle of all goods and services—from source materials to end-of-life—with public pricing that includes true social and ecological costs, ensuring authority serves transparency, not concealment.
Allow corporate pricing and marketing to obscure true costs through hidden fees, planned obsolescence, and greenwashing, with authority used to protect profit margins over public knowledge.
• 100% of goods include public lifecycle cost breakdowns • High consumer trust in pricing integrity • Reduction in hidden exploitation or ecological harm
Yes — Authority over goods is transparent and accountable. Power to “set prices” is informed by full-cost accounting, not corporate secrecy.
Create a “Participatory Land and Property Commons” where all land is held in a community land trust, with property rights structured as time-bound leases that require active community participation in stewardship decisions.
Enforce private property regimes that treat land as a commodity to be hoarded, speculated on, and excluded from community use, with participation limited to those who can afford to buy in.
• 100% of land held in community trust • High participation in land-use planning assemblies • Reduction in land speculation and displacement
Yes — Land is a shared birthright. Power to “own land” is transformed into a temporary, participatory stewardship role.
Establish a “Commons-Controlled Monetary Sovereignty” system where the community issues its own complementary currency or manages a public banking system, with monetary policy set by participatory assemblies, not distant central banks or private financiers.
Concentrate control of money creation in private central banks or global financial institutions that prioritize profit and debt over community well-being, with no democratic input on monetary policy.
• 100% of community financial institutions governed by public mandate • High circulation velocity of local currency • Reduction in debt-based economic stress
Yes — Money is a community commons, not a tool of extraction. Power to “create money” is shared, not hoarded by financial elites.
Co-create a “Participatory Accountability Charter” that defines how all financial and regulatory decisions are made through community consensus, with real-time public dashboards showing every transaction and rule change.
Impose opaque “black box” accounting systems that hide true costs and benefits behind jargon, complex algorithms, and proprietary software, silencing community input on what “fairness” even means.
• 100% of financial flows and regulatory changes publicly logged in plain language • High community trust in “Transparency Index” • Reduction in hidden subsidies or externalized costs
Yes — Transparency is a shared, co-created practice. Power to define “fairness” is circulated, not hoarded by unaccountable authorities.

Social Audit Facilitator: Ensures all communal economic processes and resource flows are open to scrutiny and evaluation by any community member.
Complementary Currency Keeper: Maintains and oversees any localized mediums of exchange designed to facilitate trade without enabling wealth hoarding.
Use-Value Cataloguer: Documents and makes accessible the available goods and services within the community, focusing on their utility and embedded labor.
Commons Land Trustee: Holds land and key assets in trust for the community, granting rights of use but not ownership or speculative sale.
Alienation Analyst: Works to identify and redesign any tasks that create feelings of powerlessness or meaninglessness, drawing from critiques of "bullshit jobs".
Voluntary Contribution Registrar: Tracks voluntary contributions to the commons fund based on ability, fostering a culture of generosity and collective responsibility.
Goods and Services, Land and Property use, and Labour and Employment hours.Commons Fund and all community projects, ensuring Transparency and Fairness.Finance and Money, Taxes and Levies are stored, debated, and updated.This Commons is the bedrock of trust in the economic system. It makes the abstract concept of "the economy" into a tangible, legible, and manageable system. It is the essential tool for the Social Audit Facilitator, the Commons Land Trustee, and the Alienation Analyst to perform their duties, preventing corruption and ensuring the system works for all.
A unified, public-facing dashboard that serves as the community's central nervous system for economic and regulatory data. It integrates all flows of value, not just financial, into a single transparent interface.
‍
"The Vital Signs Ledger"
"The Transparency Commons"
To ensure the community's economic and regulatory systems are transparent, fair, and aligned with ecological and social well-being. They are the stewards of the community's economic integrity.
Transparency Guardians Pod Digital Headquarters
To manage the high-stakes scenario where a critical common resource (e.g., water, energy, housing in a desired area, a key material) faces unsustainable demand or acute shortage. This protocol prevents hoarding, conflict, and ensures a fair, transparent, and democratic response that upholds Transparency and Fairness.
Use-Value Cataloguer or Commons Land Trustee formally declares a state of scarcity in the Vital Signs Ledger, with full data on available supply and current demand.Social Audit Facilitator hosts public forums to decide the core values for allocation (e.g., need, community benefit, historical access, lottery).Alienation Analyst, brainstorms allocation methods, each assessed for their social, economic, and ecological impact.Complementary Currency Keeper and Voluntary Contribution Registrar may implement a tracking system for fair distribution.Transparency Guardians Pod leads a review of the process, using the data to propose long-term systemic solutions (e.g., increasing production, finding substitutes) to prevent future scarcity."Resource Scarcity & Allocation" Protocol Suite
Regulatory Evolution Toolkit
A comprehensive and brutally honest assessment of the health, fairness, and transparency of the community's economic and regulatory systems. It is the community's check-up on its economic conscience.
Annual "Integrity & Equity Audit" Report System
Create an “Open Goods & Services Commons”—a public platform where community members list needs and offerings, with authority to ensure fair access and prevent hoarding.
Grant corporations permanent authority to define what “goods and services” are needed, using marketing and IP law to exclude community alternatives.
• High volume of non-monetized exchanges • Low participation in extractive marketplaces • Equitable access to essential goods
Yes — Authority ensures goods serve community needs, not profit. Power to “offer and receive” is shared.
Replace advertising with “Consent-Based Cultural Promotion”—community-curated channels that share skills, recipes, and sustainable practices only with explicit recipient consent.
Flood public and private spaces with manipulative, non-consensual advertising that creates artificial needs, erodes attention, and displaces community knowledge.
• 100% of promotions are opt-in and community-vetted • High engagement with skill-sharing content • Reduction in extractive consumption
Yes — Mandates for promotion are created and revoked by community consent, not corporate fiat.
Maintain a public “Material Accountability Ledger” that tracks all legacy petroleum and metal use, with clear protocols for safe phase-out and accountability for environmental harm.
Hide the true costs of extractive materials behind jargon, externalize ecological damage, and avoid accountability through legal loophĺ…ł and lobbying.
• 100% of legacy material use publicly logged • Steady decline in extraction-based consumption • High community trust in material stewardship
Yes — Accountability ensures those who benefit from extraction also bear responsibility for healing.
Implement “Participatory Utility Stewardship” where community members co-manage water and electricity systems through rotating roles, transparent dashboards, and collective conservation goals.
Structure utility access through opaque, centralized systems that exclude community input, prioritize profit over equity, and punish conservation as “lost revenue.”
• 100% of utility management decisions involve community input • High trust in utility governance • Reduced per-capita consumption without hardship
Yes — Participation is structured to include all users as stewards, not passive consumers.
Co-create a “Participatory Consumption Charter” that defines community standards for appropriate use, repair, and reuse—decided through consensus, not corporate dictate.
Impose top-down consumption norms through advertising, planned obsolescence, and social engineering that frame reuse as “poor” and newness as “virtuous.”
• 80%+ community participation in charter creation/review • High repair rates and low disposable consumption • Reduction in stigma around secondhand goods
Yes — Decisions about “appropriate use” are made collectively, not dictated by market logic.
Establish a “Community Food Sovereignty Council” with authority to manage local food systems—from seed to table—with power distributed to farmers, foragers, cooks, and eaters.
Concentrate food power in corporate supply chains that control seeds, processing, and distribution, leaving communities dependent and disempowered.
• 90% of residents have access to locally grown, culturally appropriate food • High participation in food decision-making • Reduction in food insecurity
Yes — Power over food is shared among all who grow, prepare, and eat it—not hoarded by agribusiness.

Cradle-to-Cradle Systems Designer: Plans and manages systems where all "waste" is redesigned as nutrient for another biological or technical process.
Food System Cultivator: Grows, forages, or prepares food with a deep understanding of its nutritional, cultural, and ecological significance.
Needs & Abundance Mapper: Creates a public, real-time map of community needs and available resources to optimize matching and minimize waste.
Public Utility Maintainer: Ensures the resilient and equitable operation of decentralized, renewable energy grids and water catchment/purification systems.
Post-Extraction Material Guardian: Manages the responsible and minimal use of legacy industrial materials, prioritizing their conservation in a circular economy.
Knowledge Sharer: Focuses on spreading useful information, skills, and innovations through popular education, rather than creating demand for unneeded goods.
Appropriate Use and Re-use).Goods and Services, Food and Drink, and materials.Water and Electricity usage, fostering collective conservation.Petroleum and Metals.Promotion and Dissemination of sustainable practices, not products.This Commons makes the community's material metabolism visible and manageable. It is the primary tool for eliminating waste, ensuring Appropriate Use and Re-use, and transforming consumption from a private act into a collaboratively managed process. It directly serves the Cradle-to-Cradle Systems Designer and the Needs & Abundance Mapper.
A dynamic, public platform that maps, manages, and optimizes the entire lifecycle of all physical objects and resources within the community, from sourcing to repurposing.
‍
"The Circular Flow Hub"
"The Metabolic Center"
To nurture a community culture and practice where nothing is wasted, resources are valued and fully utilized, and consumption is a conscious, regenerative act aligned with ecological limits.
Circular Flow Stewards Pod Digital Headquarters
To govern the high-stakes decision of introducing any new, non-perishable good into the community's material stream. This is the primary mechanism for preventing waste, avoiding toxin accumulation, and ensuring all objects are designed for the circular economy from the outset.
Cradle-to-Cradle Systems Designer and Post-Extraction Material Guardian review the proposal, assessing its fit within the community's metabolic cycles and its potential to become waste.Needs & Abundance Mapper facilitates a discussion on whether the object fulfills a genuine need or duplicates existing Goods and Services.Knowledge Sharer then documents the object's successful integration for the community."New Object Introduction & Lifecycle" Protocol Suite
Resource Flow Optimization Toolkit
Annual "Metabolism of Things" Report System
‍
Implement an “Equitable Participation & Rotation System” where essential but less desirable tasks are made visible, shared, and rotated equitably—ensuring authority serves fairness, not convenience.
Grant permanent exemptions from undesirable work to the powerful, while burdening the marginalized with “essential” labor that is undervalued and invisible.
• 100% of essential tasks are publicly logged and rotated • High satisfaction with fairness of work distribution • Reduction in resentment and burnout
Yes — Authority ensures equitable participation, not permanent privilege.
Maintain a public “Transparent Health & Safety Accountability Ledger” that tracks workplace conditions, incidents, and responses—with clear protocols for community audit and redress if standards are violated.
Obscure workplace hazards behind corporate secrecy, blame workers for injuries, and deny accountability through legal loopholes and non-disclosure agreements.
• 100% of community workspaces meet safety standards • High trust in safety governance • Reduction in work-related injury and illness
Yes — Accountability is transparent and community-led, not hidden or externalized.
Implement “Consent-Based Care & Support Mandates” where all mutual aid and care work is organized through explicit, revocable community agreements that honor the dignity of both giver and receiver.
Frame care as a private burden or a commodity to be bought, excluding it from community responsibility and allowing care workers to be exploited without support.
• 100% of care mandates include consent and revocation pathways • High satisfaction among care givers and receivers • Reduction in care-related burnout and isolation
Yes — Mandates for care are created and revoked by community consent, not imposed by market or family obligation.
Create an “Inclusive Capacity Building Commons” where all community members have access to skill development, tools, and mentorship—structured to include those with different learning styles, abilities, and time constraints.
Gatekeep skill development through cost, jargon, and inflexible schedules, ensuring only the already-empowered can access high-productivity roles.
• 95%+ accessibility rate for capacity-building resources • High skill diversification across the community "• Reduction in productivity gaps by race
Yes — Participation in skill-building is structured for inclusion, not exclusion.
Establish a “Vocation & Capacity Discovery Network” that matches individual gifts and passions with community needs through coaching, skill-sharing, and community mapping—ensuring everyone’s power to contribute is seen and nurtured.
Concentrate power over “career paths” in credentialing institutions and corporate HR, excluding those without formal qualifications and reducing vocation to a transactional role.
• High participation in vocation discovery sessions • Strong alignment between personal gifts and community roles • Reduction in “overqualified” or “underemployed” distress
Yes — Power to define “vocation” is circulated through community recognition, not hoarded by gatekeepers.
Co-create a “Participatory Livelihood Charter” that defines community standards for meaningful, dignified work—decided through consensus, not market dictate.
Impose top-down labor markets that treat human time as a commodity to be minimized, silencing community input on what “meaningful work” even means.
• 80%+ community participation in charter creation/review • High rates of vocation-aligned work • Reduction in burnout and alienation
Yes — Decisions about “livelihoods” are made collectively, not dictated by profit logic.

Meaningful Livelihood Guarantor: Ensures every community member has access to a variety of meaningful tasks that provide purpose, dignity, and a claim on social wealth.
Vocation Mentor: Helps individuals discover their passions and aptitudes, and connects them to roles where they can best contribute to the common good.
Participatory Rotator: Designs systems to ensure necessary but less desirable tasks are shared equitably, and that power and interesting work are distributed widely.
Skill Deepening Coach: Facilitates continuous learning and skill-sharing to enhance the collective capacities and joyful mastery of the community.
Workplace Well-being Guardian: Assesses all tasks for physical and psychological risks, and advocates for and implements ergonomic and humane practices.
Care Network Organizer: Weaves the web of communal support for children, the elderly, and those who are sick or disabled, recognizing care as fundamental economic work.
Connection and Vocation).Participation and Equity).Care and Support for children, elders, and those in need.Health and Safety metrics and Capacity and Productivity in terms of community outcomes, not output.This Commons makes the entire economy of care and labor visible and manageable. It is the primary tool for the Meaningful Livelihood Guarantor to match people with roles, the Participatory Rotator to ensure fairness, and the Care Network Organizer to mobilize support. It prevents the exploitation and invisibility of care work and ensures everyone's basic needs are met as a right of membership.
‍
"The Contribution & Care Ledger"
"The Livelihood Commons"
To ensure every community member has access to meaningful, dignified contributions and is supported in their overall well-being. They focus on matching individual passion with community need, distributing necessary work fairly, and guaranteeing a high quality of life for all.
Livelihood Weavers Pod Digital Headquarters
To address the high-stakes, recurring challenge of ensuring that essential but potentially stressful, repetitive, or undesirable work (e.g., waste processing, night safety watches, cleaning communal spaces) is distributed fairly, and that no one is overburdened to the point of burnout, while also ensuring these tasks get done. This directly tests the community's commitment to Equity and Care.
Workplace Well-being Guardian and Participatory Rotator collaboratively audit all necessary tasks, rating them for stress, desirability, and physical/emotional load.Meaningful Livelihood Guarantor and Vocation Mentor intervene supportively. They work with the individual to reduce their load and the Participatory Rotator to find others to share the work, potentially through a lottery or incentive system (e.g., extra leisure time, recognition).Care Network Organizer ensures that anyone undertaking a high-burden role has a dedicated support person and access to restorative practices.Skill Deepening Coach to train people in new methods.‍
"Burden & Vitality Balancing" Protocol Suite
Labor Optimization Toolkit
Annual "State of Work & Well-being" Report System
Implement “Consent-Based Health Tech Mandates” where all medical technologies (from apps to devices) require explicit, revocable community consent and are evaluated for their impact on care relationships—not just efficiency or cost.
Deploy surveillance-based health tech that extracts data, erodes trust, and replaces human care with algorithmic management—without meaningful consent or community oversight.
• 100% of health tech mandates include consent and revocation pathways • High trust in health tech governance • Reduction in care alienation and data harm
Yes — Mandates for health tech are created and revoked by community consent, not corporate fiat.
Maintain a public “Transparent Tech Accountability Ledger” that tracks all community technology education—showing who is trained, in what, by whom, and with what outcomes—ensuring accountability for equitable access and skill development.
Obscure tech education behind paywalls, jargon, and gatekeeping, creating a permanent “digital underclass” while the powerful hoard technical literacy as a form of control.
• 100% of tech education programs publicly logged • High participation across demographics • Reduction in digital literacy gaps
Yes — Accountability ensures tech education serves the whole community, not just an elite.
Create an “Inclusive Construction & Building Commons” where all community members have access to open-source building plans, local materials, and skill-sharing—structured to include those with different abilities, time constraints, and learning styles.
Gatekeep construction knowledge through proprietary designs, expensive certifications, and exclusionary zoning, ensuring only the already-empowered can shape the built environment.
• 95%+ accessibility to building resources and training • High rate of community-led construction projects • Reduction in unaffordable or ecologically harmful building
Yes — Participation in building is structured for inclusion, not exclusion.
Implement a “Participatory Mobility Design System” where all transport infrastructure (bike lanes, transit, walkways) is co-designed with residents through rotating working groups, ensuring authority serves community needs, not car-centric or corporate interests.
Grant permanent authority to engineers and developers to design transport systems that prioritize speed, throughput, and private vehicle use—excluding community input and reinforcing dependence on extractive systems.
• 90% of residents involved in mobility planning • High usage of non-motorized transport • Reduction in traffic violence and emissions
Yes — Authority over movement is co-created, not imposed by distant planners.
Co-create a “Participatory Tech Appropriateness Charter” that defines community standards for technology adoption—prioritizing repairability, simplicity, and ecological fit—through consensus, not expert decree.
Impose top-down technology mandates that prioritize corporate profit, planned obsolescence, and complexity, silencing community input on what “robust” even means.
• 80%+ community participation in charter creation/review "• High adoption of repairable• Reduction in e-waste and digital dependency
Yes — Decisions about “appropriate tech” are made collectively, not dictated by market or state.
Establish an “Open Communications Commons”—a community-owned mesh network with open protocols, transparent data governance, and free access for all—ensuring power over information flows is shared, not hoarded.
Concentrate control of communications in corporate platforms that extract data, manipulate attention, and exclude the marginalized through cost or design.
• 100% of community has free, secure network access • High trust in data sovereignty • Reduction in surveillance and algorithmic manipulation
Yes — Power over communication is a shared commons, not a corporate commodity.

Appropriate Tech Evaluator: Assesses technologies for their durability, repairability, accessibility, and alignment with ecological and social values.
Decentralized Network Gardener: Maintains resilient, open-source communication infrastructures that are free from corporate or state control.
Mobility Systems Steward: Plans and maintains multi-modal transit (walking, biking, public transport) that is free/low-cost and minimizes ecological impact.
Ecological Builder: Constructs and retrofits housing and public buildings using natural, local, and non-toxic materials in ways that integrate with the ecosystem.
Popular Educator: Facilitates lifelong learning that is free and integrated with social life, focusing on critical thinking, cooperation, and practical skills.
Community Health Worker: Provides frontline, holistic healthcare and promotes public health, focusing on prevention and community-wide well-being.
Appropriateness and Robustness).Communications and Information platforms, free from corporate control.Transport and Movement, energy grids, and Water and Electricity systems.Construction and Building and public works.Education and Training on maintaining and understanding the technological commons.Medicine and Health Treatment.This Commons prevents technological enshittification, vendor lock-in, and planned obsolescence. It is the essential resource for the Appropriate Tech Evaluator to assess new tools, the Decentralized Network Gardener to maintain communications, and the Mobility Systems Steward to optimize transit. It ensures technology serves the community, not the reverse.
A unified, open-source repository and management system for all the community's foundational technologies and infrastructures. It treats these systems as public utilities to be stewarded for the common good, not owned for profit.
"The Symbiotic Stack"
"The Techno-Ecological Center"
To ensure the community's technological and infrastructural systems are resilient, liberating, accessible, and aligned with ecological and social values. They are the guardians and gardeners of the built and digital environment.
Infrastructure Stewards Pod Digital Headquarters
To govern the high-stakes process of adopting any new significant technology or infrastructure project (e.g., a new network protocol, energy source, or construction technique). This is the primary defense against technologies that create dependency, centralize power, waste resources, or have hidden social costs.
Appropriate Tech Evaluator leads a preliminary review of the proposed technology against core criteria: repairability, energy use, resource footprint, data governance, and freedom from coercive design.Medicine and Health Treatment, Education and Training, social equity, ecology) of the technology 10 and 50 years into the future.Popular Educator. The Decentralized Network Gardener ensures broad, inclusive discussion.Ecological Builder and Mobility Systems Steward monitor its real-world performance against promised benefits.Community Health Worker to inform future decisions."Technology Adoption & Impact Assessment" Protocol Suite
‍
Infrastructure Optimization Toolkit
Annual "State of Our Infrastructure" Report System
Implement a “Consent-Based Participatory Budgeting Framework” where all major resource allocations require explicit, revocable community consent—and can be revoked if misaligned with collective values.
Impose budgetary decisions through opaque, top-down channels that favor the powerful, with no clear process for community input or revocation of misused mandates.
• 100% of major allocations require public consent • High usage of revocation pathways without fear of reprisal • Equitable distribution of resources across all groups
Yes — Mandates for re-distribution are created and revoked by community consent, not elite fiat.
Maintain a public “Wealth Disparity Monitor & Accountability Ledger” that tracks distributions of wealth and power in real-time, with clear protocols for community intervention when harmful inequality emerges.
Obscure wealth disparities behind jargon and complexity, while actively structuring systems (e.g., tax loopholes) that concentrate wealth in the hands of a few.
• Real-time public dashboard of wealth distribution • High community trust in equity governance • Steady decline in Gini coefficient and power concentration
Yes — Accountability ensures wealth circulates equitably. Power to measure and correct inequality is shared.
Implement a “Universal Livelihood Provisioner System” that distributes the means of livelihood unconditionally to all—decoupling survival from wage labor and market participation.
Enforce a wage-based system that ties survival to employment, creating precarity, exploitation, and a permanent underclass of “disposable” labor.
• 100% of community members receive universal livelihood support • Drastic reduction in poverty and wage-based anxiety • High community well-being scores
Yes — Authority over livelihood is a universal right, not a market privilege.
Co-create a “Participatory Surplus Mobilization Charter” that defines how community surplus is invested in shared resilience—decided through consensus, not elite decree.
Impose top-down investment decisions that prioritize shareholder returns over community well-being, silencing input on how surplus is mobilized.
• 100% of surplus investments publicly logged with community rationale • High trust in “Surplus Mobilization Index” • Reduction in extractive or speculative investments
Yes — Decisions about surplus are made collectively. Power to invest is circulated, not hoarded.
Create a “Housing Guarantor Commons” where all housing is held in a community land trust, with access guaranteed as a human right—structured through participatory design and equitable allocation.
Treat housing as a commodity to be hoarded, speculated on, and excluded from community control, with participation limited to those who can afford to buy in.
• 100% of residents have secure, affordable housing • High participation in housing design and governance • Zero homelessness or housing insecurity
Yes — Participation in housing is structured for universal access, not market exclusion.
Establish a “Commons Archivist Stewardship Council” with rotating membership to protect and enhance the community’s shared cultural and material inheritance—ensuring power over heritage is distributed, not centralized.
Concentrate control of heritage in unaccountable institutions that gatekeep access, monetize culture, and exclude marginalized voices from stewardship.
• 100% of heritage assets publicly accessible • High participation in stewardship roles • Revitalization of endangered cultural practices
Yes — Power over heritage is shared through rotating, community-led stewardship.

Surplus Mobilizer: Manages the community's collective surplus, directing it towards productive investments in future resilience and shared prosperity.
Commons Archivist: Protects and curates the community's shared cultural and material inheritance, ensuring it is enhanced for future generations.
Universal Provisioner: Distributes the means of livelihood (e.g., via resource credits or universal basic services) unconditionally to all community members.
Housing Guarantor: Ensures high-quality, dignified housing is available to all as a human right, managed as a social good rather than a commodity.
Wealth Disparity Monitor: Tracks distributions of wealth and power within the community and proposes corrective measures to prevent harmful inequality.
Participatory Budgeting Facilitator: Guides the democratic process where the community decides how to allocate its shared resources for the common good.
Social Wealth and Heritage).Re-distribution and Apportionment.Housing and Subsistence, rather than personal Wages and Income accumulation.Wealth Disparity Monitor.This Commons makes the concept of "wealth" a public, democratic concern, not a private secret. It prevents the hidden Accumulation and Mobilization of power and ensures that the community's wealth is consciously directed toward Equity and Inclusion. It is the primary tool for every role in this subdomain to perform their function with full transparency.
A transparent, real-time accounting system that makes the community's complete material and social wealth visible and manageable by all. It is the definitive source of truth for what the community owns and how it flows.
"The Commonwealth Ledger"
"The Abundance Commons"
To ensure the community's collective wealth is recognized, nurtured, and distributed in a way that guarantees dignified livelihoods for all, prevents harmful inequality, and builds long-term resilience for the common good.
Wealth Stewards Pod Digital Headquarters
To manage the most high-stakes and potentially conflict-ridden process in the community: deciding how to spend the collective surplus (the Commons Fund). This is where the community's values are materially tested, and where competition for resources can threaten social accord.
Surplus Mobilizer and Wealth Disparity Monitor begin by publishing a clear report on the Commons Fund status and a needs assessment based on data from the Social Wealth Ledger.Participatory Budgeting Facilitator organizes a series of themed assemblies where proposals are presented, debated, and refined, with the Commons Archivist providing historical context.Universal Provisioner ensures all basic provisioning needs are met before discretionary projects are funded.Housing Guarantor and other role-bearers then receive a clear mandate and resources to execute their part of the plan."Wealth Justice & Redistribution" Protocol Suite
Multi-Capital Accounting Toolkit
Annual "State of Our Commonwealth" Report System
