This is a brief review comparing Bernardo Kastrup and Donald Hoffman's mechanisms of how consciousness unfolds into reality.
For centuries, the most fundamental question has persisted: What is the true nature of reality?
On one side, science presents a compelling story of a physical universe, built of quarks and forces, where life and consciousness are accidental byproducts. On the other, mystics and philosophers have long insisted that the world is an illusion—a dream—and that consciousness is the only true reality.
Until recently, these two views seemed irreconcilable. But now, a groundbreaking synthesis is emerging from the frontiers of cognitive science and metaphysics. It suggests that both are, in a way, correct. The physical world is an illusion, and we are now discovering the source code that makes this collective dream possible.
This synthesis brings together three powerful ideas:
And it leads to a startling conclusion: Hoffman’s conscious agents are not the ultimate reality. They are the mechanical rules—the very code of manifestation—through which the one universal consciousness dreams itself into countless parts.
‍
The materialist story is crumbling under the weight of its own contradictions. The "Hard Problem of Consciousness" asks a simple, devastating question: How can the arrangement of electrochemical signals in a lump of grey matter feel like the vibrant redness of a rose or the pain of heartbreak? Materialism has no answer.
Furthermore, quantum physics has shown us that at its base, reality is a cloud of potentialities, not solid stuff. The observer is inextricably linked to the observed.
It was this crisis that led thinkers like Hoffman and Kastrup to a radical inversion of the standard model.
‍
Bernardo Kastrup's Analytic Idealism argues with philosophical rigor that reality is, at its core, one universal consciousness. To experience itself, this "monad" does something profound: it dissociates. Using the metaphor of Dissociative Identity Disorder, Kastrup suggests that you and I are "alters" of this one mind. The physical world, including our bodies and brains, is not the source of consciousness but the external appearance of the inner life of these alters. We are all characters in a shared dream, forgetting we are the dreamer.
Donald Hoffman's Interface Theory arrives at a similar starting point from a different direction. Using evolutionary game theory, he proves that "fitness beats truth." Our perceptions have not evolved to show us reality as it is, but to provide a simple, survival-oriented user interface. Space, time, and objects are mere icons, like a desktop folder on your computer, that hide an unfathomably complex reality.
But what is that reality? Hoffman proposes that the fundamental units of existence are "conscious agents"—mind-like entities that interact in vast networks. Spacetime is just the desktop GUI they use to interact.
‍
Here lies the apparent conflict. Kastrup describes a single, universal consciousness. Hoffman describes a vast plurality of fundamental conscious agents. Is reality one, or is it many?
This is where an ancient wisdom tradition provides the key to a powerful synthesis.
‍
In Advaita Vedanta, the concept of Maya is the divine, creative power that makes the one non-dual reality (Brahman) appear as the manifold universe. It is not a simple illusion but a principle of manifestation with two core functions:
Let's map our modern theories onto this ancient framework.
Hoffman's conscious agents are not the dreamer. They are the fundamental code of the Projecting Power.
They are the mathematical, "mechanical" rules that govern how the one consciousness structures its own dream of separation. They describe the logic of interaction between dissociated alters, creating a consistent, shared virtual reality from within the dream itself.
‍
Imagine a single, pure white light in a film projector. This is the Monad—Kastrup's universal consciousness.
The light is projected, but the audience never sees its pure form. This is the Veiling Power (Āvaraṇa).
Now, imagine the film reel itself. It is not the light, but it is the structured medium through which the light expresses itself as a world of stories. The reel is etched with intricate, repeating patterns—code that dictates how characters, objects, and laws interact on the screen.
These fundamental, repeating patterns on the film reel are Hoffman's conscious agents.
They are the "mechanical manifestations" that create the appearance of a pluralistic world. The characters in the movie (us, the alters) interact according to this code, never realizing that their entire reality, their very capacity to interact, is made possible by patterns etched in the same, single source.
‍
This synthesis gives us a coherent and profoundly beautiful map of existence:
Hoffman has not discovered a plurality of ultimate beings. He has, with mathematical precision, begun to reverse-engineer the source code of Maya. He is describing the "how" of the dream within Kastrup's "what" of the dreamer.
This is more than just a philosophical curiosity. It is an invitation to a new way of seeing. The world you perceive is real in the way a dream is real—it has consistency, rules, and consequences. But it is not ultimately real. You are, at your core, not a fragile biological body navigating a physical world, but an expression of the one consciousness that is dreaming it all into being.
The search for truth, then, is not a journey outward into space, but a journey inward—past the icons on the desktop, beyond the code of the conscious agents, to rediscover the singular Light that is both the projector and the screen.